United Nations Agenda 21
by The United Nations
Source of Publication: Click Here — Detailed Summary of Publication: Click Here
Return to Index: Click Here
Brief Summary Below
United Nations Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action adopted by 178 governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. The document outlines a wide range of strategies and initiatives aimed at promoting sustainable development and addressing environmental, social, and economic issues on a global scale. However, several negative aspects of this agenda warrant closer examination, particularly regarding global control and the ceding of national sovereignty.
One of the primary concerns regarding Agenda 21 is its potential to erode the sovereignty of individual nations. The document calls for increased international cooperation and the establishment of global institutions to oversee the implementation of its objectives. This could lead to a situation where national governments are forced to cede significant decision-making power to unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in international organizations. Such a power shift could undermine the principles of democracy and self-determination, as well as the ability of nations to pursue their own unique interests and priorities.
Another issue with Agenda 21 is its emphasis on central planning and top-down control. The document outlines a highly prescriptive set of policies and initiatives that cover virtually every aspect of human society, from land use and transportation to education and healthcare. This micromanagement is not only impractical and unlikely to be effective, but it also raises serious concerns about individual liberty and freedom of choice. By imposing a one-size-fits-all approach to sustainable development, Agenda 21 will trample individuals, communities, and nations’ rights and preferences.
Furthermore, implementing Agenda 21 would require a massive expansion of government power and intrusion into people’s lives. The document calls for establishing a vast network of monitoring and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with its objectives, including surveillance technologies, mandatory reporting requirements, and punitive measures for non-compliance. This level of state control would destroy privacy, civil liberties, and the fundamental human right to be left alone.
In addition to these concerns, there are questions about the scientific validity and objectivity of the information and assumptions underpinning Agenda 21. The document relies heavily on the findings and recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which has faced criticism for its use of flawed data, its reliance on unverified computer models, and its failure to consider alternative perspectives and hypotheses adequately. By basing its policies and initiatives on potentially biased and inaccurate information, Agenda 21 risks leading the world down a path of costly and ineffective solutions to problems that may not even exist.
United Nations Agenda 21 is a roadmap to Global Slavery. It should be rejected out of hand by the United States.
