UN Plots Global Human Replacement
by The UN Populations Division
Source of Publication: Click Here — Detailed Summary of Publication: Click Here
Brief Summary Below
The United Nations document “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” published in 2001, explores the potential impact of immigration on the demographic trends of several countries, including the United States. The report examines how migration could address issues such as population decline, aging populations, and the solvency of social security systems. While the document does not explicitly advocate for any particular policy, it does raise questions about the implications of large-scale immigration on national sovereignty and identity.
As you read and understand what’s presented, you’ll realize that the entire four years of the Biden administration were spent implementing the Great Replacement, as described herein. There was no consideration for American Citizens and no requirements for illegal aliens permitted to enter. It was the full-on execution of this plan, with the end game of the destruction of the American Republic.
The report suggests that the United States would need to experience a significant increase in immigration to maintain its current population size and support ratio (the number of working-age people per retiree). Specifically, the report estimates that the United States would need to welcome an average of 1.6 million immigrants per year between 2000 and 2050 to maintain a constant population size and 13.1 million immigrants per year to maintain a constant support ratio.
While the document presents these figures as hypothetical scenarios rather than policy recommendations, critics have argued that the report’s findings could be used to justify mass immigration policies that undermine U.S. sovereignty and national identity. Some of the most egregious infractions against U.S. sovereignty that could arise from the implementation of such policies include:
- Erosion of national borders: Large-scale immigration could lead to a de facto open borders policy, rendering the concept of national borders meaningless and undermining the U.S. government’s ability to regulate the flow of people into the country.
- Strain on public resources: A massive influx of immigrants could significantly burden public services such as healthcare, education, and social welfare programs, potentially leading to increased taxes and reduced availability of these services for native-born citizens.
- Cultural dilution: Large-scale immigration from diverse cultural backgrounds could lead to the erosion of American cultural norms, values, and traditions, potentially resulting in a fragmented society with little sense of shared identity or purpose.
- Political transformation: The addition of millions of new immigrants could dramatically alter the political landscape of the United States, potentially shifting the balance of power in favor of parties or interest groups that prioritize the needs and interests of immigrants over those of native-born citizens.
- Economic disruption: A sudden increase in the labor force could lead to wage suppression, job displacement, and increased competition for employment opportunities, particularly in low-skilled industries.
- Security risks: The sheer volume of immigrants entering the country could make it more difficult for authorities to conduct thorough background checks and security screenings, potentially allowing criminals, terrorists, or other malicious actors to enter the country undetected.
- Loss of social cohesion: The rapid introduction of large numbers of people from diverse cultural backgrounds could lead to increased social tensions, resentment, and conflict, potentially undermining the social fabric of American communities.
- Legal and administrative challenges: The processing and integration of millions of new immigrants would likely place a significant strain on the U.S. legal and administrative systems, potentially leading to bureaucratic delays, backlogs, and increased taxpayer costs.
While the UN document does not explicitly advocate for any of these outcomes, critics argue that implementing its findings could significantly undermine U.S. sovereignty and national identity in the name of addressing demographic challenges.
This happened when the Biden administration unilaterally executed the actions presented in this United Nations document.
